A named S-to-D card ranking is not responsible yet: the creator has not published a complete card roster or comparable income and auction-value data. Use the rubric below to rank cards you have actually observed.
Rank cards by repeat income, winning bid, consistency, and the cash options left after the auction. Do not promote a card because its label or artwork looks rare.
These tiers describe decision quality for cards you observe in your own game; they are not names of official cards.
A card repeatedly earns strong cash without forcing you past your reserve-first limit.
The card produces useful cash, but the observation window or auction cost is less favorable.
Rarity or appearance is visible, but the income-to-bid result has not justified a higher price.
| Variant/system | Confirmed | Still unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Gold | Named in official description | Named cards, rate, income, and fair bid |
| Diamond | Named in official description | Named cards, rate, income, and fair bid |
| Rainbow | Named in official description | Named cards, rate, income, and fair bid |
| Secret | Named; 2X chance pass listed | Roster, base chance, income, and guarantee |
| Mutations | Mutation system and 2X pass listed | Mutation names, effects, rates, and rankings |
No complete creator-owned card roster with comparable income and auction-value data is currently public.
Record the winning bid, repeat income observations, and how much cash remains, then rank sustainable returns above appearance alone.
No. Secret confirms a category, not a published income rate or fair auction price.
When named cards and repeatable exact-game observations can support meaningful comparisons.
